Right to Information Act (2005)

The Right to Information Act, 2005 gives the method via which the public could make requests for facts held through the public authorities. It also affords for the installation of information Commissions to cope with court cases and appeals arising inside the records gadget. The Act is one of the most significant Acts which enable common residents to scrutinize the legislature and its working. This has been generally utilized by residents and media to reveal defilement, progress in government work, costs related data, and so on. All constitutional authorities, offices, possessed and controlled, additionally, those associations which are considerably financed by the administration goes under the domain of the Act.

The Act likewise commands the public government or state government, to give an ideal reaction to the residents’ solicitation for data. The Act additionally forces punishments if the authorities delay in reacting to the resident in the specified time. The Act gives for the openness of the governmental activities and to submit regular records. The Act also provides minimal exceptions to the proper to facts where countrywide safety, public order, privacy, and so forth are concerned.


As the citizens of India are paying taxes, we need to have each proper to recognize how the government is spending that cash and how do we keep a test on them, by way of having access to information that compiles their functioning? For this reason, there ought to be a privilege vested in the citizens of the nation to get to the data concerning the lead or Act released by public authorities, so the arrangement of checks and equalization can be kept up. Hence, the Right to information has enacted.

What is RTI?

Right to Information means the Right to Information on hand beneath this Act that is held via or under the management of any public authority and consists of the inspection of labor, files, statistics; taking notes, extracts or certified copies of documents or records; taking certified samples of material; obtaining information within the shape of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in some other digital mode or via printouts where such information is stored in system software or every other tool. It was the first biggest achievement of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Government.


Right to Information Act in India took around 80 years to change a smudged arrangement of power, legitimate by the “colonial officials secrets act”, where individuals can request the “Right to Data”. The arrangement of administration in India has customarily been misty. Since our legislature held the frontier Official Secrets Act OSA of the British time, considerably after autonomy, and kept on working mysteriously at a managerial level. The Central Civil Service Conduct Rules of 1964 additionally fortify the OSA by disallowing the administration hirelings from conveying the official report to anybody without authorization.

The interest of Right to Information began with the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) development in Rajasthan for getting straightforwardness town accounts in country India. They needed data accessible in legitimate data recorded in government documents.

A draft RTI law was proposed in 1993 by the CERC, Ahmedabad.

In 1996, a draft model law on the Right to Information to the Government of India by the Press Council of India headed by Justice P B Sawant. The draft model law was later altered and renamed as Freedom of Information Bill 1997.

In the Raj Narain versus the State of Uttar Pradesh case, The Supreme Court decided that the Right to data will be treated as a key right under Article 19. The Supreme Court held that in the Indian majority rules system, individuals are the experts and they reserve the Right to Think about the working of the legislature.

The Right to Information picked up power when the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was embraced in 1948 giving everybody the option to look for, get, data and thoughts through any media and paying little mind to boondocks.

In this manner, the legislature instituted the Right to Information act in 2005 which gives apparatus to practicing this essential right.


The RTI Act became enacted in 2005. It turned into passed in Lok Sabha on 11 May 2005 and on 12 of may by Rajya Sabha through the UPA authorities. It acquired the assent of President of India on 15th June 2005. The Act takes 120 days after approval by the president to came into force in the country as it becomes effective on 12 October 2005.

The objective of the Act became progressive whilst, as it opened all legitimate departments across the country to public scrutiny.

The RTI insured well-timed response to citizen requests for government facts which are underneath managed of public government. It promotes transparency and responsibility within the operating of any public body. It extends to the whole of India except the Jammu and Kashmir.

Before Passing of RTI Act 2005

Constitution of India had given to citizens of Indian the right likewise given in the RTI Act before the Act passed. Constitution of India has given this right in Article 19(1)(a) and Article 21 where Article 19 (1)(a) is Right to freedom of speech and expression that gives the Right to receive information and Article 21 is right to life that gives the concept of the right to know to the citizens of India.

Thus, the Right to information is not just a legal right which rose out of Right To Information Act yet it is preexisted and considered as a key right revered in Part III of the Constitution. Although it is not explicitly referenced anyplace in the Indian constitution yet falls inside the domain of “The right to freedom of Speech and Expression” and “Right to life and Personal Liberty”. Through the Interpretation of the Supreme Court in different milestone Judgments, we can construe that Right To Information is Fundamental Right. 

In RPL vs Indian Express Limited, The court held that “Right to information” is a fundamental right and falls inside the domain of Article 21 for example Right to life and individual freedom”. 

In Express Newspaper Ltd VS. Association of India, The court held that the first motivation behind the privilege to the Right to speak freely of discourse and articulation is that individuals ought to have the option to shape a supposition and uninhibitedly impart it to other people. 

On account of the People Union for Civil Liberties versus Association of India, The Apex Court broke down right to data in the light of human rights which is imperative for making organization and administration responsible and progressively straightforward. Thus from the above perception of the Supreme Court, we can say that the Right to Information is our principal right.

The Objective of the Act

  • To give a lawful system of residents popularity based Right to access to data heavily influenced by open specialists.
  • To advance straightforwardness and guarantee responsibility.
  • To orchestrate clashing interest and needs in tasks of government, and utilization of assets.
  • To advance the act of disclosure of data to save vote based goals.
  • To advance responsibility in the working of each open power, accordingly decrease debasement.

Important Provisions of the Act

There are 31 Sections and 6 chapters enumerated in the Act.

Section 2 (f)

“Information” signifies any material in any structure, including Records, Documents, Memos, messages, Opinions, Advice, Press discharges, Circulars, Orders, Logbooks, Contracts, Reports, Papers, Samples, Models, Data material held in any electronic structure and data identifying with any private body which can be gotten to by a Public Authority under some other law for the present in power.

Section 2(j)

“Right to Information” signifies the right to information available under this Act which is held by or heavily influenced by any open power and incorporates the privilege to:

  • Examination of work, archives, records;
  • Taking notes extricates or ensured duplicates of reports or records;
  • Taking guaranteed tests of material;
  • Getting data as diskettes, floppies, tapes, videotapes, or in some other electronic mode or through printouts where such data is put away in a PC or some other gadget.

Section 2(h)

Public Authority means all specialists and bodies under the association government, state government, or nearby bodies. The common social orders that are generously supported, straightforwardly, or in a roundabout way, by the open assets likewise fall inside the ambit of RTI.

Section 3

Subject to the arrangements of this Act, all residents will reserve the option to data.

Section 4

RTI Act requires Suo Motu revelation of data by every public authority. Be that as it may, such divulges have stayed not exactly agreeable.

Section 5

Each public authority will assign an official, inside one hundred days of the authorization of this Act, at each sub-divisional level or other sub-area levels as a Central Assistant Public Information Officer or a State Assistant Public Information Officer, by and large, to get the applications for data or bids under this Act for sending the equivalent forthwith to the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or senior official.

Information Commission, all things considered:

Given that where an application to data or offer is given to a Central Assistant Public Information Officer or a State Assistant Public Information Officer, all things considered, a time of five days will be included processing the period for the reaction.

Each Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, by and large, will manage demands from people looking for data and render sensible help to the people looking for such data.

Section 6

Prescribes a basic method for making sure about data.

An individual, who wants to acquire any data under this Act, will make a solicitation recorded as a hard copy or through electronic methods in English or Hindi or in the official language of the zone wherein the application is being made, going with so much expense as might be recommended,

Section 7

Prescribes a time span for giving information(s) by PIOs. Diverse time limits are endorsed for various circumstances:

At the point when an application is engaged by any PIO then they have a commitment to answer to the application inside a period cutoff of 30 days and any application which is introduced before aide PIO must be answered to inside 35 days.

The application moves to another PIO in 30 days which starts or tallies from the day on which its application is moved.

Any application introduced comparable to data in regards to debasement by any schedule made sure about the organization or any sort of infringement of human rights that are secured under schedule II of RTI Act at that point answer must be allowed inside 45 days with the authorization of the central information commission.

On the off chance that data looked for concerns the life or freedom of an individual, it will be provided inside 48 hours.

On the off chance that the application is sent through the Assistant Public Information Officer or it is sent to a wrong public authority, five days will be added to the time of thirty days or 48 hours, all things considered.

Section 8 (1)

It makes reference to exceptions against outfitting data under the RTI Act. There are 25 associations which are excluded from the privilege to data under the “second schedule” of this Act. These incorporate the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Intelligence Agencies, and so forth, certain bodies that essentially play out the examination work with respect to the nation’s security, uncommon help department, opiates control board. The data will in general prefer the sovereignty, security, and integrity of the nation.

Some of the exempted information is of National Security;

  • Forbidden by law;
  • Trade secret that is mostly patent or commercially confidential information;
  • The Privilege of parliament;
  • Cabinet papers;
  • Confidential information received from the foreign government;
  • Information regarding investigation

Section 8 (2)

It accommodates divulgence of data excluded under the Official Secrets Act, 1923 if the bigger open intrigue is served.

Section 19

Two-level instrument for a claim. It gives a two-level arrangement of offers first appeal and second appeal.

  • First Appeal: Any individual who is distressed by the choice of the Central PIO or State PIO, all things considered, or not accepting the mentioned data inside 30 days, can incline toward a first appeal before the First Appellate Authority.

The Appellate Authority will be an official who is senior in rank to the Central PIO or State PIO, in every open position. Furthermore, the appeal is to be documented inside 30 days from the expiry of timespan determined for accepting a choice or from receipt of a choice. In any case, this constraint period will be loose if the re-appraising authority is fulfilled that there is an adequate reason that forestalled the recording of advance inside as far as possible.

An appeal can be favored likewise by the third party if there should be an occurrence of third party information. And third party methods an individual other than the resident creation a solicitation for data and incorporates open position.

  • Second Appeal: The Second appeal lies before the State or focal data commission against the choice of the principal investigative position. The subsequent intrigue must be recorded inside 90 days from the date of receipt of the choice, which can be approved, on the off chance that the commission is fulfilled that there are adequate purposes behind the deferral.

Section 19(7)

The choice of Central or State Information Commission, by and large, will be authoritative6. The data commission can survey their own choices, if there is a specialized mistake in the choice or if there was an exclusion to think about important material realities in a specific case.

Likewise, it is t be noticed that it is the requestor who bid under the Act. There is no arrangement in the RTI Act to consider requests or objections by the PIO himself against the request for an investigative power. This is on the grounds that the PIO is the data supplier and subsequently, there is no doubt of disavowal of data by the PIO.

Section 20

Information Commission has the power to impose a penalty on PIO or APIO in case of:

  • Non-acceptance of information;
  • Application rejected without specific reason;
  • Misleading/ Wrong/ Incomplete information;
  • Obstruct flow of information;
  • Destruction of information

The penalty will be of Rs.25 per day the maximum of Rs.25000 that will be of up to 100 days.

Section 23

Lower courts are banned from engaging suits or applications. Nonetheless, the writ locale of the Supreme Court of India and high courts under Article 32 and 225 of the Constitution stays unaffected. The appeal can be given to high court against state information commission and to the supreme court against central information commission.

Section 26

Role of government

The government of India from time to time takes initiative to give knowledge among citizens about the Act. They are doing :

  • Dissemination of Information related to RTI;
  • Provides user guide on the online platform that guides the applicant about the filling process of RTI;
  • Instructed the public authorities to provide information under RTI;
  • Arranging various awareness programs on RTI websites or app to inform the citizens about it;
  • Providing personal training to the officers regarding giving information;
  • To make online available all the details of PIO like fax/landline numbers, office address, etc.


The Right to information is the need of the current situation since it helps to keep up straightforwardness and responsibility in government work. It assists with making a circumstance where the overall population can get subtleties of government activity, plans, Yojana, plans, and so forth, which helps to improve the responsiveness of government towards society. The RTI Act can be known as a triumph just if the organization acknowledges that they have a sacred commitment to serve data, in the case of solicitation. There is consistently a wide divergence between the enactment in principle and enactment practically speaking. A few of the enactments have met disappointment in down to earth usage. Furthermore, this adds to the ‘social reason for’ Right to information, which will keep up straightforwardness in the organization, to control defilement to a more prominent degree. What’s more, it must be noticed that few enactments have been sanctioned after the autonomy, yet not many of them have been effectively executed and having such a monstrous social effect. Maybe there is no other law like the RTI Act, which contacts the everyday existence of a common man. This law gives us a precious chance to upgrade the procedures of administration, especially at the grassroots level where the residents’ interface is most extreme.


Q1. What is RTI?

Q2. Which information is exempted under RTI?

Q3. How many days did it take to be effective in the nation after the approval of the president?

Q4. How may time it took to dispose of an RTI?

Q.5 How to file RTI?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *