Ban on Sex Selection

Strain to boycott pre-birth sex-determination has developed with rising sex proportions during childbirth in certain nations. Governments feel constrained to act, and bans appear to be a prompt advance they can take. Be that as it may, such bans have been set up for quite a while in South Korea, China, and India and the accessible proof recommends they are hard to actualize and have restricted effect. This is demonstrated most unmistakably in the Chinese enumeration information, which illuminates the blended impacts of a concentrated exertion to actualize the boycott. On the other hand, different examinations have indicated that different arrangements – including mass informing and measures to build sex value – show genuinely fast effect in lessening child inclination and expanding parental interest in young ladies. Such approaches can for all time lower child inclination and sex-determination, while likewise improving young ladies’ life-possibilities.


The laws of India don’t allow fetus removal. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (MTP)[i] Act, which disallows fetus removal, was sanctioned with a view towards containing the size of the family. In any case, now and again the craving for a little family may have exceeded the longing for an offspring of a particular sexual orientation, prompting premature births where the sex of the embryo was not quite the same as that ideal by the family. The MTP Act specified that a fetus removal may legally be done in qualified conditions. In any case, the corrupt plotted to abuse the law to have premature births directed with the end goal of sex determination.

Afterward, creative advancements made sex determination simpler, and without the guidelines to control the utilization of such advances, these advances started to be abused for sex-specific premature births. These activities required institution of the Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 (PNDT)[ii] in 1994. This demonstration was revised in 2002 out of a push to close provisos contained in the first demonstration.

Two laws that deny the sex determination of an unborn child in India are the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (MTP), as altered in 2002, and the Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 (PNDT), as corrected in 2002. The previous Act denies premature birth aside from just in certain certified circumstances, while the last disallows sex determination with a view towards prematurely ending it.

Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971

Under the Indian Penal Code, causing a premature birth, regardless of whether brought about by the pregnant lady herself, is a criminal offence, except if it is done to spare the life of the lady. The offense is deserving of detainment for a time of three years, by fine, or by both[iii].

The MTP Act accommodates a premature birth to be performed by an enrolled clinical specialist in an administration emergency clinic gave, as he would see it;

  • Continuation of the pregnancy, (which at the time must not surpass twelve weeks and);
  • Includes a hazard to the life of the lady or a grave physical issue to her physical or psychological well-being; or,
  • There is a considerable hazard that the kid, when conceived, would endure such physical or mental anomalies as to be truly handicapped[iv].

A pregnancy brought about by assault is attempted to establish a grave physical issue to the psychological wellness of the pregnant woman[v]. The Act likewise permits a fetus removal to be performed when the pregnancy happens because of the disappointment of any gadget or strategy utilized by any wedded lady or her partner to confine the quantity of kids. Where the pregnancy is over twelve weeks however under twenty weeks, the feeling with respect to the clinical need for a fetus removal in the above conditions must be shaped in compliance with common decency by two clinical experts. At the point when the pregnancy is under 12 weeks, the assessment of one clinical professional is vital for the endorsement of a premature birth. All premature births must be acted in an administration medical clinic, paying little heed to the length of the pregnancy.

Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994

The PNDT Act of 1994, later altered in 2002, was authorized with the target as expressed in the introduction;

… to accommodate the denial of sex choice, previously or after origination, and for guideline of pre-natal analytic methods for the motivations behind distinguishing hereditary anomalies or metabolic issues or chromosomal variations from the norm or certain intrinsic abnormalities or sex-connected issues and for the anticipation of their abuse for sex assurance prompting female feticide and for issues associated therewith or accidental thereto.

In this way, the PNDT Act precludes the utilization of all innovations with the end goal of sex determination, which would likewise incorporate the new chromosome partition methods.

With the sweeping disallowance contained in segments 3, 4 and 5 of the PNDT Act, there is successfully a restriction on sex determination in India. It is absurd to expect to utilize pre-natal analytic procedures to prematurely end babies whose sex and family ancestry show a high hazard for certain sex-connected maladies, or to pick a baby whose sex is less vulnerable to certain sex-connected ailments. This sweeping preclusion may have all the earmarks of being an inconsistency to the arrangements of the MTP Act, which allows the premature birth of an embryo that is at a danger of being brought into the world with genuine physical or mental inabilities. While it is legitimately admissible to prematurely end an embryo in danger of genuine physical or mental handicaps, it isn’t allowable to choose a baby of a sex which is more averse to experience the ill effects of a sex-connected infection.

The PNDT Act basically accommodates the accompanying:

  • Forbiddance of sex choice, when origination.
  • Guideline of pre-birth analytic methods (e.g., amniocentesis and ultrasonography) for the identification of hereditary variations from the norm, by confining their utilization to enlisted organizations. The Act permits the utilization of these strategies just at an enlisted place, for a predetermined reason, and by a certified individual who is enrolled for the reason.
  • Anticipation of the abuse of such methods for sex determination, previously or after origination.
  • Denial of the notice of any methods utilized for sex choice just as those utilized for sex assurance.
  • Preclusion on the offer of ultrasound machines to people not enlisted under this Act.
  • Discipline for infringement of the Act. Infringement conveys a five-year prison term and a fine of around US $200-$1,000. All offenses are cognizable when police may capture without a warrant. They are additionally non-bail able and non-compoundable[vi].


Indian laws don’t, under any situation, permit sex assurance tests to be attempted with the plan to end the life of a fetus growing in the mother’s womb, except if there are other signs for end of the pregnancy as determined in the MTP Act of 1971. Any demonstration causing the end of the pregnancy would add up to foeticide, and notwithstanding rendering the doctor criminal obligated, is viewed as expert unfortunate behavior on his part, prompting his reformatory deletion.

[i] Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 No. 34, Acts of Parliament 1971, 1971 (India); See also: Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2002 No. 64, Acts of Parliament 2002, 2002 (India).

[ii] The Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, No. 57 of 1994, and the Pre-natal Diagnostic Technologies (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Amendment Act, No. 2002, No. 14 of 2003

[iii] Indian Penal Code, Act, 1860 No. 45, Acts of Parliament1860, 1860 (India) Sec. 312.

[iv] supra, note 1, Sec. 3(2)(ii).

[v] Id., Sec. 3(2) (ii), Explanation I.

[vi] supra, note 3, Sec. 27.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *